Gleason v. Chester

1 Day 152
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 1, 1803·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

By the organization of our juridi[153] cal svstem, on entering an action, after reversal, the plaintiff is entitled to immediate relief, or required further to pursue his remedy, according to the state of his case, on a view of the record. The rights of the parties require, that such view be retrospective so far, and so far only, as the proceedings, on record, appear to have been impugned, by the judgment of reversal. In this case, the certaintv and verity of the plaintiffs5 declaration appear, by the record, to have been ascertained, in a legal course of judicial proceedings. Their claim appears, on the record, certain, valid, and complete ; and it remained, that, on their motion, without further trial, they should have judgment for the sum, found by the jury, in their favour.

1803.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gleason v. Chester, 1 Day 152 (Colo. 1803).

1 Day 152 (Gleason v. Chester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mulholland v. Mulholland
624 A.2d 379 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1993)
Brennan v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.
47 A. 668 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1900)
Palmer v. Gallup
16 Conn. 555 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1844)
Davenport v. Bradley
4 Conn. 309 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1822)
Judson v. Blanchard
3 Conn. 579 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1821)