Gleason v. Burgess

167 S.E. 916, 46 Ga. App. 486, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 115
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 3, 1933
Docket22386
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 167 S.E. 916 (Gleason v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gleason v. Burgess, 167 S.E. 916, 46 Ga. App. 486, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 115 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinions

Broyles, C. J.

There is no merit in the motion (made in the brief of counsel for the defendant in error) to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that the bill of exceptions contains no specific assignments of error. The bill of exceptions contains specific assignments of error, and the motion to dismiss is denied.

On the hearing the defendant in certiorari made a timely motion to dismiss the writ, upon the ground that there was no proper and legal certiorari bond given by the plaintiff in certiorari, as required by law. This motion was overruled, and that judgment is assigned as error in the bill of exceptions. The Civil Code (1910), § 5185, provides as follows: “Before any writ of certiorari shall issue, . . the party applying for the same, his agent, or attorney, shall give bond and good security, conditioned to pay the adverse party in the cause the eventual condemnation money, together with all future costs, . . which bond . . shall be filed with the petition for certiorari, and the security on said bond shall be liable as securities on appeal.” (Italics ours.) In the instant case, as shown by the record, the bond given by the plaintiff in certiorari was not signed by any person or corporation as surety, the only signature thereto being that of the principal (the plaintiff in certiorari). It is obvious that the bond given was not the bond required by law; and as a certiorari bond is not amendable, the judge of the superior court erred in refusing to dismiss the certiorari; and that error rendered the further proceedings in the case nugatory. See Camp v. Bacon Fruit Co., 117 Ga. 149 (43 S. E. 425); Harwell v. Marshall, 125 Ga. 451 (2) (54 S. E. 93).

Judgment reversed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunter v. Lanier
39 S.E.2d 79 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 S.E. 916, 46 Ga. App. 486, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gleason-v-burgess-gactapp-1933.