Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Glazer v. Williams

Glazer v. Williams

201 A.D.2d 959, 610 N.Y.S.2d 909
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 4, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 959 (Glazer v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glazer v. Williams, 201 A.D.2d 959, 610 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinions

Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendants failed to meet their burden on this motion for summary judgment to establish as a matter of law that they were not chargeable with malpractice (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557).

All concur except Callahan, J. P., and Doerr, J., who dissent and vote to reverse in the following Memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Metrokane Imports, Ltd. v. Kane, Dalsimer, Kane, Sullivan and Kurucz
150 A.D.2d 153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.D.2d 959, 610 N.Y.S.2d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glazer-v-williams-nyappdiv-1994.