Glazer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glazer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

268 A.D. 886, 50 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1944·Published

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: There is no showing of special circumstances as provided in section 288 of the Civil Practice Act. All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance on the authority of Ettinger v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Accident Assn. of America (266 App. Div. 876). (The order directs an examination before trial.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: There is no showing of special circumstances as provided in section 288 of the Civil Practice Act. All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance on the authority of Ettinger v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Accident Assn. of America (266 App. Div. 876). (The order directs an examination before trial.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Glazer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 268 A.D. 886, 50 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

268 A.D. 886 (Glazer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related