Glazer v. City of Chesterfield

485 S.W.3d 792, 2016 WL 1317993, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 315
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 5, 2016
DocketNo. ED 103203
StatusPublished

This text of 485 S.W.3d 792 (Glazer v. City of Chesterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glazer v. City of Chesterfield, 485 S.W.3d 792, 2016 WL 1317993, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 315 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Steve Glazer appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the City of Chesterfield in a personal injury suit arising from a cycling accident.. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the' trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
485 S.W.3d 792, 2016 WL 1317993, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glazer-v-city-of-chesterfield-moctapp-2016.