Glazer v. Choong-Hee Lee

896 N.E.2d 89, 11 N.Y.3d 781, 866 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 2961
New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 2008·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal against Michael A. Werner, M.D. and M.A.Z.E. Laboratories, dismissed upon the ground that as to those parties the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glazer v. Choong-Hee Lee, 896 N.E.2d 89, 11 N.Y.3d 781, 866 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 2961 (N.Y. 2008).

896 N.E.2d 89 (Glazer v. Choong-Hee Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.