Glazer v. Choong-Hee Lee
896 N.E.2d 89, 11 N.Y.3d 781, 866 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 2961
This text of 896 N.E.2d 89 (Glazer v. Choong-Hee Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Glazer v. Choong-Hee Lee, 896 N.E.2d 89, 11 N.Y.3d 781, 866 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 2961 (N.Y. 2008).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal against Michael A. Werner, M.D. and M.A.Z.E. Laboratories, dismissed upon the ground that as to those parties the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
896 N.E.2d 89, 11 N.Y.3d 781, 866 N.Y.S.2d 603, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 2961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glazer-v-choong-hee-lee-ny-2008.