Glazer v. Chase Home Fin., L.L.C.

Ohio Supreme Court

Glazer v. Chase Home Fin., L.L.C.

6 N.E.3d 1201, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1463

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 21, 2014

Docket2014-0391

StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.E.3d 1201 (Glazer v. Chase Home Fin., L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glazer v. Chase Home Fin., L.L.C., 6 N.E.3d 1201, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1463 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 99736 and 99875, 2013-Ohio-5589. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motions for admission pro hac vice of Nicolette Glazer and Danielle J. Gould, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 99736 and 99875, 2013-Ohio-5589. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal.

Upon consideration of the motions for admission pro hac vice of Nicolette Glazer and Danielle J. Gould, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.E.3d 1201, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glazer-v-chase-home-fin-llc-ohio-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack