Home/Ninth Circuit/Glazer (Bertha) v. King County, Piehler (Arthur E.), Costello (Leo), Matteson (Lance, Candace), Elliott (Richard W.), Howard (Frank D.), Kaseburg (Fred A.), Roberts (Frank H.), Gaiser (H. Graham, Jane Doe), Revelle (George H.)

Glazer (Bertha) v. King County, Piehler (Arthur E.), Costello (Leo), Matteson (Lance, Candace), Elliott (Richard W.), Howard (Frank D.), Kaseburg (Fred A.), Roberts (Frank H.), Gaiser (H. Graham, Jane Doe), Revelle (George H.)

825 F.2d 413, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10476
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 29, 1987·No. 85-4333·Published

Opinion

825 F.2d 413

Glazer (Bertha)
v.
King County, Piehler (Arthur E.), Costello (Leo), Matteson
(Lance, Candace), Elliott (Richard W.), Howard (Frank D.),
Kaseburg (Fred A.), Roberts (Frank H.), Gaiser (H. Graham,
Jane Doe), Revelle (George H.)

NO. 85-4333

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

JUL 29, 1987

Appeal From: W.D.Wash.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glazer (Bertha) v. King County, Piehler (Arthur E.), Costello (Leo), Matteson (Lance, Candace), Elliott (Richard W.), Howard (Frank D.), Kaseburg (Fred A.), Roberts (Frank H.), Gaiser (H. Graham, Jane Doe), Revelle (George H.), 825 F.2d 413, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 10476 (9th Cir. 1987).

825 F.2d 413 (Glazer (Bertha) v. King County, Piehler (Arthur E.), Costello (Leo), Matteson (Lance, Candace), Elliott (Richard W.), Howard (Frank D.), Kaseburg (Fred A.), Roberts (Frank H.), Gaiser (H. Graham, Jane Doe), Revelle (George H.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.