Glaze v. Greene

Fourth Circuit

Glaze v. Greene

438 F. App'x 224

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 6, 2011·No. No. 11-6478·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sheridan A. Glaze appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glaze v. Greene, No. 1:11-cv-00286-LO-TRJ (E.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sheridan A. Glaze appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glaze v. Greene, No. 1:11-cv-00286-LO-TRJ (E.D.Va. Mar. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Glaze v. Greene, 438 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

438 F. App'x 224 (Glaze v. Greene) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related