Glaze v. Foodmaker Inc
This text of Glaze v. Foodmaker Inc (Glaze v. Foodmaker Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 4 AT SEATTLE 5 KIRK and RISE GLAZE, individually and as guardians ad litem to JERRUD 6 GLAZE, 7 Plaintiffs, C93-1825 TSZ 8 v. ORDER 9 FOODMAKER INC. d/b/a Jack-In- The-Box Restaurants, et al., 10 Defendants. 11
12 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a motion brought by Jerrud Collins, 13 formerly known as Jerrud Glaze, docket no. 155. In January 1995, the Court approved a 14 settlement in this matter, which at the time involved a minor, namely Jerrud Dale Glaze. See Order (docket no. 142). In July 1996, the Court approved amendments to the trust 15 16 agreement relating to the settlement. See Order (docket no. 153). The Amended Trust 17 Agreement designated American Guaranty and Trust Company (“American Guaranty”) 18 as Trustee and Ken Horwitz of PaineWebber, Inc. as Registered Representative for the 19 Trust. See Am. Trust Agr. at 1, Ex. A to Burnett Decl. (docket no. 156). PaineWebber 20 was subsequently acquired by UBS AG, a Swiss bank, and is now known as UBS Wealth 21 Management USA (“UBS”). Horwitz is currently a Senior Vice President in USB’s Seattle office. See Horwitz at ¶ 2 (docket no. 163). 22 1 Under the terms of the Amended Trust Agreement, Glaze was entitled to terminate 2 the Trust after reaching the age of eighteen, provided that he was judicially declared
3 competent. See Am. Trust Agr. at 11 (docket no. 156). If not exercised at the age of 4 eighteen, the right to terminate the Trust would be available every five years, provided 5 that the competency requirement was met. Id. at 11-12. In July 2009, the King County 6 Superior Court found Glaze fully competent, without legal disability, and authorized to 7 terminate the Trust; Glaze was eighteen at the time. See Ex. C to Burnett Decl. (docket 8 no. 156); see also Am. Trust Agr. at 2 (docket no. 156) (setting forth Glaze’s date of
9 birth). In June 2011, Glaze changed his name to Jerrud Dale Collins. Ex. B to Burnett 10 Decl. (docket no. 156). In April 2014, at the age of 23, Collins terminated the Trust. See 11 Ex. D to Burnett Decl. (docket no. 156). 12 Pursuant to an Annuity Contract issued by Safeco Life Insurance Company, the 13 Trust was supposed to receive the following payments:
14 $50,000 per year for five years beginning in March 2010 $300,000 in March 2019 15 $450,000 in March 2021 $675,000 in March 2023 16 Ex. B to Burnett Supp. Decl. (docket no. 162 at 16). Safeco has since become Symetra 17 Life Insurance Company (“Symetra”). The “owner” of the Annuity Contract is listed as 18 SABSCO, which apparently refers to Symetra Assigned Benefits Service Company, and 19 the “payee” is described as “American Guaranty & Trust Co. TTEE Jerrud Glaze Trust 20 JN 48927” with the Seattle address of “Paine Webber Inc.; Attn: Ken Horwitz.” Id. In 21 October 2006, American Guaranty was purchased by RBC Trust Company (DE) Ltd. 22 1 (“RBC Trust”). See Ex. E to Burnett Decl. (docket no. 156). In 2019, RBC Trust sent 2 correspondence to Symetra indicating that the Trust had been terminated and that future
3 payments should be made to Collins. See id (docket no. 156 at 36-37). Symetra replied 4 that, because Glaze/Collins is not the payee on the Annuity Contract, annuity payments 5 cannot be wired to him, and that a certified court order would be required before Symetra 6 would distribute funds directly to Glaze/Collins. See Ex. F to Burnett Decl. (docket 7 no. 156). Collins now seeks the requisite order. 8 The Court interprets Collins’ motion as having been brought under Washington’s
9 Structured Settlement Protection Act (“WSSPA”). Under the WSSPA, RBC Trust f/k/a 10 American Guaranty, as payee under the Annuity Contract, may propose to transfer its 11 payment rights, and the transferee (in this case, Glaze/Collins) may seek approval of the 12 transfer. See RCW 19.205.010(8); RCW 19.205.050. Although the WSSPA envisions 13 that a transferee is ordinarily a third party who agrees to immediately provide a lump sum
14 to the payee in exchange for the right to receive, in the future, the higher amount of one 15 or more annuity payments, see In re Rapid Settlement, Ltd.’s Application (RSL-3B-IL, 16 Ltd. v. Symetra Life Ins. Co.), 166 Wn. App. 683, 687, 271 P.3d 925 (2012), the situation 17 at issue in this case nevertheless falls within the scope of the WSSPA, and the transfer 18 requires the Court’s approval, see RCW 19.205.030.
19 Having reviewed all of the materials submitted by Glaze/Collins in support of his 20 WSSPA motion, the Court FINDS and ORDERS as follows: 21 (1) The movant Jerrud Collins is the same individual identified as Jerrud Glaze 22 in the Amended Trust Agreement and as the “annuitant” in the Annuity Contract, and the 1 Court is satisfied that the current motion is not brought for purposes of fraud or other 2 improper motive. See Collins Decl. (docket no. 159); Gurnard Decl. (docket no. 160);
3 Horwitz Decl. (docket no. 163). 4 (2) Collins has exercised his right to terminate the Trust at issue, and he is 5 entitled to the funds that were to be paid into the Trust pursuant to the Annuity Contract 6 dated January 26, 1995, that was issued by Safeco Life Insurance Company, now known 7 as Symetra. 8 (3) The proposed transfer is in the best interests of both the annuitant and the
9 payee, taking into account all of the circumstances. See RCW 19.205.030(1). 10 (4) RBC Trust f/k/a American Guaranty, as payee under the Annuity Contract, 11 is aware of the proposed transfer, has itself advocated in writing for the proposed transfer, 12 and has either received or waived independent professional advice. RCW 19.205.030(2). 13 (5) The transfer “does not contravene any applicable statute or the order of any
14 court or other government authority.” RCW 19.205.030(3). 15 (6) The annuity payments due under the Annuity Contract bearing the contract 16 number AA684368, attached as Exhibit B to the Declaration of Jason W. Burnett, docket 17 no. 162 at 11-17, are TRANSFERRED from payee “American Guaranty & Trust Co. 18 TTEE Jerrud Glaze Trust JN 48927” to annuitant Jerrud Dale Collins f/k/a Jerrud Glaze,
19 and shall be paid to Collins in the manner directed by him and/or his attorney. 20 (7) Symetra and/or SABSCO shall forthwith take all steps necessary to 21 effectuate this Order. 22 1 (8) The Clerk is directed to send a CERTIFIED COPY of this Order to counsel 2 of record for Jerrud Dale Collins f/k/a Jerrud Glaze.
3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated this 17th day of August, 2020. 5 A 6 7 Thomas S. Zilly United States District Judge 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Glaze v. Foodmaker Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glaze-v-foodmaker-inc-wawd-2020.