Glaze v. Department of Defense

Fourth Circuit

Glaze v. Department of Defense

441 F. App'x 981

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2011·No. No. 11-6671·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sheridan A. Glaze appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glaze v. Department of Defense, No. 1:11-cv-00311-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed May 3, 2011; entered May 5, 2011). We dispense [982]*982with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sheridan A. Glaze appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glaze v. Department of Defense, No. 1:11-cv-00311-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed May 3, 2011; entered May 5, 2011). We dispense [982]*982with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Glaze v. Department of Defense, 441 F. App'x 981 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

441 F. App'x 981 (Glaze v. Department of Defense) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related