Glawe v. Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen PLC

• Court: District Court, D. Arizona
• Decided: September 23, 2019
• Docket: 2:18-cv-01282
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Curtis Glawe, ) No. CV 18-1282-PHX-JAS (JR)) ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) 11 vs. ) ) 12 ) Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen) 13 PLC, et al. ) ) 14 Defendants. ) ) 15 16 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 17 Magistrate Judge Rateau that recommends granting Defendants’ motion for summary 18 judgment. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the 19 Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court 20 will not consider any objections or new evidence. 21 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Rateau’s 22 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 23 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 24 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 26 (1) Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56) is accepted and 27 adopted. 28 (2) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 40) is granted. 1 || (3) This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and 2 || close the file in this case. 4 DATED this 20" day of September, 2019. 6 7 co. et 8 James A. So 9 United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-