Glawe v. Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen PLC

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided September 23, 2019·No. 2:18-cv-01282·Unknown

Opinion

Curtis Glawe, ) No. CV 18-1282-PHX-JAS (JR)) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) vs. ) ) ) Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen) PLC, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Rateau that recommends granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Rateau’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56) is accepted and adopted. (2) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 40) is granted. (3) This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. DATED this 20" day of September, 2019. co. et James A. So United States District Judge -2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glawe v. Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen PLC, (D. Ariz. 2019).

Glawe v. Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen PLC (Glawe v. Carpenter, Hazlewood, Delgado & Bolen PLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Headache and Pain Center v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH
24 F. Supp. 2d 1200 (D. Kansas, 1998)
Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp.
170 F.3d 734 (Seventh Circuit, 1999)