Glaum v. Woodrow
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2025 ND 7
Joseph Edward Glaum, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Rebecca Woodrow, Defendant
No. 20240153
Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald Hager, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joseph E. Glaum, Bismarck, ND, plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief. Glaum v. Woodrow No. 20240153
[¶1] Glaum appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his civil case. This Court reviews findings of fact under the “clearly erroneous standard of N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a).” Cavare, Inc. v. Kjelgren, 2021 ND 236, ¶ 8, 968 N.W.2d 141. The district court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous because it was not induced by an erroneous view of the law, evidence exists to support it, and we are not left with a definite and firm conviction the court made a mistake. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2025 ND 7 (Glaum v. Woodrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.