Glauber v. Patof
This text of 269 A.D. 687 (Glauber v. Patof) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal of so much of the judgment as awards money damages to plaintiffs and votes for a dismissal of the complaint with.respect thereto (Browne v. Hibbets, 290 N. Y. 459), and otherwise concurs in the affirmance of the judgment. [183 Misc. 400.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D. 687, 54 N.Y.S.2d 384, 16 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 922, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glauber-v-patof-nyappdiv-1945.