Glatzer v. Glatzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glatzer v. Glatzer

15 A.D.3d 185, 788 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 968

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.3d 185 (Glatzer v. Glatzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glatzer v. Glatzer, 15 A.D.3d 185, 788 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P Roberts, J), entered on or about September 25, 2003, which, inter alia, denied appellant’s motion to vacate an order, same court and Judge, entered on or about June 5, 2002, denying appellant’s objections to an order of the Hearing Examiner for failure to file transcripts of the proceedings before the Hearing Examiner, as previously directed, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant fails to substantiate his claim that one of the three transcripts he was directed to file is lost and therefore cannot be filed. In any event, appellant’s various arguments lack merit. Concur — Saxe, J.P, Friedman, Marlow, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle P Roberts, J), entered on or about September 25, 2003, which, inter alia, denied appellant’s motion to vacate an order, same court and Judge, entered on or about June 5, 2002, denying appellant’s objections to an order of the Hearing Examiner for failure to file transcripts of the proceedings before the Hearing Examiner, as previously directed, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellant fails to substantiate his claim that one of the three transcripts he was directed to file is lost and therefore cannot be filed. In any event, appellant’s various arguments lack merit. Concur — Saxe, J.P, Friedman, Marlow, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.3d 185, 788 N.Y.S.2d 610, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glatzer-v-glatzer-nyappdiv-2005.