Glatstein v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glatstein v. City of New York

6 A.D.2d 824, 176 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5452

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 824 (Glatstein v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glatstein v. City of New York, 6 A.D.2d 824, 176 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries, and by her father for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from a judgment entered on the dismissal of the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs’ case. The infant was watching her brother playing in a public schoolyard on a day when school was not in session. She was struck by a piece of linoleum which some boys were throwing at each other. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with [825]*825costs (Diele v. Board of Educ., 138 N. Y. S. 2d 766, affd. 1 A D 2d 676; Lutzkar v. Board of Educ., 262 App. Div. 881, affd. 287 N. Y. 822; Kantor v. City of New York, 251 App. Div. 454). Present—Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by an infant to recover damages for personal injuries, and by her father for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from a judgment entered on the dismissal of the complaint at the close of the plaintiffs’ case. The infant was watching her brother playing in a public schoolyard on a day when school was not in session. She was struck by a piece of linoleum which some boys were throwing at each other. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with [825]*825costs (Diele v. Board of Educ., 138 N. Y. S. 2d 766, affd. 1 A D 2d 676; Lutzkar v. Board of Educ., 262 App. Div. 881, affd. 287 N. Y. 822; Kantor v. City of New York, 251 App. Div. 454). Present—Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 824, 176 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glatstein-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack