Glastrusions, Inc. v. New Plastic Corporation

Ninth Circuit

Glastrusions, Inc. v. New Plastic Corporation

339 F.2d 1022

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 19, 1965·No. 19342_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In our judgment the findings of fact, while perhaps not as specific with reference to the prior art as we might have wished, are sufficient and are not clearly erroneous. They support the Court’s determination that the patent in issue lacked invention and was a mere aggregation of elements old in the art.

Under the circumstances we need not deal with the attack on the District Court’s determination that there was no infringement.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In our judgment the findings of fact, while perhaps not as specific with reference to the prior art as we might have wished, are sufficient and are not clearly erroneous. They support the Court’s determination that the patent in issue lacked invention and was a mere aggregation of elements old in the art.

Under the circumstances we need not deal with the attack on the District Court’s determination that there was no infringement.

Judgment affirmed.

Glastrusions, Inc. v. New Plastic Corporation, 339 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

339 F.2d 1022 (Glastrusions, Inc. v. New Plastic Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.