Glassman v. Glassman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glassman v. Glassman

27 A.D.2d 829, 281 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 829 (Glassman v. Glassman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glassman v. Glassman, 27 A.D.2d 829, 281 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered October 20, 1966 (CPLR 5520, subd. [c]), unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, and motion granted to the extent of vacating the restraining notice with respect to the accounts of Jack London Productions, Inc., and Nationwide Financial Corporation. The judgment creditor failed [830]*830to present evidentiary support of the judgment debtor’s interest in the corporations’ bank accounts. Such disposition is without prejudice to further application by the third parties, Zenith Factors, Inc., and Trophy Productions, Inc., for similar relief as to their corporate accounts. As so modified, the order appealed from is otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to any party. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Rabin and MeGivem, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered October 20, 1966 (CPLR 5520, subd. [c]), unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, and motion granted to the extent of vacating the restraining notice with respect to the accounts of Jack London Productions, Inc., and Nationwide Financial Corporation. The judgment creditor failed [830]*830to present evidentiary support of the judgment debtor’s interest in the corporations’ bank accounts. Such disposition is without prejudice to further application by the third parties, Zenith Factors, Inc., and Trophy Productions, Inc., for similar relief as to their corporate accounts. As so modified, the order appealed from is otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to any party. Concur — Stevens, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Rabin and MeGivem, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 829, 281 N.Y.S.2d 969, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glassman-v-glassman-nyappdiv-1967.