Glassford v. Hackett

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Glassford v. Hackett

3 Va. 193

DecidedApril 23, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. 193 (Glassford v. Hackett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glassford v. Hackett, 3 Va. 193 (Va. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

LYONS, Judge.

After stating the case, delivered the resolution of the Court, to the following effect: 1st. That the bond did not recite that the goods had been restored to the debtor, and, therefore, was not a statutory bond upon which a motion could be sustained. 2d. That the act of Assembly did not give a motion against executors upon much bonds. Therefore, quacunque via data, the judgment of the District Court was right, and ought to be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LYONS, Judge.

After stating the case, delivered the resolution of the Court, to the following effect: 1st. That the bond did not recite that the goods had been restored to the debtor, and, therefore, was not a statutory bond upon which a motion could be sustained. 2d. That the act of Assembly did not give a motion against executors upon much bonds. Therefore, quacunque via data, the judgment of the District Court was right, and ought to be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Va. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glassford-v-hackett-vactapp-1802.