Glassford v. Hackett
3 Va. 193
Opinion
After stating the case, delivered the resolution of the Court, to the following effect: 1st. That the bond did not recite that the goods had been restored to the debtor, and, therefore, was not a statutory bond upon which a motion could be sustained. 2d. That the act of Assembly did not give a motion against executors upon much bonds. Therefore, quacunque via data, the judgment of the District Court was right, and ought to be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Glassford v. Hackett, 3 Va. 193 (Va. Ct. App. 1802).
3 Va. 193 (Glassford v. Hackett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.