Glassford & Henderson v. Hackett

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Glassford & Henderson v. Hackett

3 Va. 166

Court of Appeals of Virginia·Decided April 23, 1802·Published

Opinion

LYONS, Judge.

After stating the case, delivered the resolution of the Court, to the following effect: 1st. That the bond did not recite that the goods had been restored to the debtor, and, therefore, was not a statutory bond upon, which a motion could be sustained. 3d. That the act of Assembly did not give a motion against executors upon such bonds. Therefore, quacunque via data, the judgment of the District Court was right, and ought to be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LYONS, Judge.

After stating the case, delivered the resolution of the Court, to the following effect: 1st. That the bond did not recite that the goods had been restored to the debtor, and, therefore, was not a statutory bond upon, which a motion could be sustained. 3d. That the act of Assembly did not give a motion against executors upon such bonds. Therefore, quacunque via data, the judgment of the District Court was right, and ought to be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed

Glassford & Henderson v. Hackett, 3 Va. 166 (Va. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

3 Va. 166 (Glassford & Henderson v. Hackett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.