Glasser v. Keller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glasser v. Keller

197 A.D.2d 561, 603 N.Y.S.2d 766

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the plaintiffs (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated March 3, 1991, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated June 6, 1991, which, upon granting reargument, adhered to its prior determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 3, 1991, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated June 6, 1991, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 6, 1991, is affirmed, for reasons stated by Lonschein, J., at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the plaintiffs (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated March 3, 1991, and (2) from an order of the same court, dated June 6, 1991, which, upon granting reargument, adhered to its prior determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 3, 1991, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated June 6, 1991, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 6, 1991, is affirmed, for reasons stated by Lonschein, J., at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Glasser v. Keller, 197 A.D.2d 561, 603 N.Y.S.2d 766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

197 A.D.2d 561 (Glasser v. Keller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related