Glass v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Glass v. State

288 S.W.2d 522, 162 Tex. Crim. 598, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1305

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 8, 1956·No. No. 28,022·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, a fine of $200.00.

No statement of facts on the main trial accompanies the record. ' ! !

[599] The sole question presented for review is the sufficiency of the complaint which was signed and sworn to by Rose Marie Murray, a secretary in the district attorney’s office.

Appellant’s contention that the complaint is invalid has been recently overruled in Catchings v. State, (page 342 this volume), 285 S.W. 2d 233; Whiteside v. State, 286 S.W. 2d 137, and Lurie v. State, No. 27,851, (page 604 this volume).

All proceedings appearing regular and no reversible error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, a fine of $200.00.

No statement of facts on the main trial accompanies the record. ' ! !

[599] The sole question presented for review is the sufficiency of the complaint which was signed and sworn to by Rose Marie Murray, a secretary in the district attorney’s office.

Appellant’s contention that the complaint is invalid has been recently overruled in Catchings v. State, (page 342 this volume), 285 S.W. 2d 233; Whiteside v. State, 286 S.W. 2d 137, and Lurie v. State, No. 27,851, (page 604 this volume).

All proceedings appearing regular and no reversible error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Glass v. State, 288 S.W.2d 522, 162 Tex. Crim. 598, 1956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1305 (Tex. 1956).

Pincite

288 S.W.2d 522 (Glass v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related