Glass v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Glass v. State

357 So. 2d 200

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 28, 1978

DocketNo. HH-56

StatusPublished

This text of 357 So. 2d 200 (Glass v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glass v. State, 357 So. 2d 200 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sentence for possession of more than five grams of cannabis — five years imprisonment suspended after two years and followed by five years probation — exceeded the maximum allowable penalty for that offense. Section 775.-082(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1975). The cause is thus remanded for correction of the sentencing error. See footnote 4, Noble v. State, 353 So.2d 819 (Fla.1977). Appellant’s other points are without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sentence for possession of more than five grams of cannabis — five years imprisonment suspended after two years and followed by five years probation — exceeded the maximum allowable penalty for that offense. Section 775.-082(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1975). The cause is thus remanded for correction of the sentencing error. See footnote 4, Noble v. State, 353 So.2d 819 (Fla.1977). Appellant’s other points are without merit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

357 So. 2d 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glass-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack