Glass v. . Moore
142 S.E. 585, 195 N.C. 871, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 244
Opinion
The only question presented by this appeal: Is the testimony of a single witness sufficient to attack an officer’s return of process purporting regular service? We cannot so bold. All the authorities are to the contrary in this jurisdiction. See Trust Co. v. Nowell, ante, 449.
For the reasons given there must be a
New trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Glass v. . Moore, 142 S.E. 585, 195 N.C. 871, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 244 (N.C. 1928).
142 S.E. 585 (Glass v. . Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guthrie v. Ray
235 S.E.2d 146 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1977)
Harrington v. Rice
97 S.E.2d 239 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Nelson v. Lamb
81 S.E.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1954)