Glass v. Lockheed Federal Credit Union
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Leigh-Davis Glass appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her action under the Truth in Lending Act and other consumer protection laws. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because the order of dismissal is not a final order. See Disabled Rights Action Comm. v. Las Vegas Events, Inc., 375 F.3d 861, 870 (9th Cir.2004).
Because we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, we do not consider Glass’s motion to refer this matter to the Judicial Council.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
235 F. App'x 655 (Glass v. Lockheed Federal Credit Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.