Glass v. Gryte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glass v. Gryte

240 A.D. 744

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 744 (Glass v. Gryte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glass v. Gryte, 240 A.D. 744 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur. Findings of fact IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, IX (two are numbered IX) and X contained in the decision are reversed. The court makes new findings that the so-called contract for the purchase of lots numbered 205 and 206, signed and executed on or about May 5, 1927, is void because of false and fraudulent representations made by plaintiff’s assignor Helmolt, president of the corporation National City Builders, that he would cancel a contract which the defendant had made to purchase lots 217 and 218 of the same tract. He then had no interest in the contract and no power to cancel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur. Findings of fact IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, IX (two are numbered IX) and X contained in the decision are reversed. The court makes new findings that the so-called contract for the purchase of lots numbered 205 and 206, signed and executed on or about May 5, 1927, is void because of false and fraudulent representations made by plaintiff’s assignor Helmolt, president of the corporation National City Builders, that he would cancel a contract which the defendant had made to purchase lots 217 and 218 of the same tract. He then had no interest in the contract and no power to cancel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glass-v-gryte-nyappdiv-1933.