Glass v. Glass

299 S.E.2d 693, 278 S.C. 527, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 207
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 6, 1983
Docket83-OR-033
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 299 S.E.2d 693 (Glass v. Glass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glass v. Glass, 299 S.E.2d 693, 278 S.C. 527, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 207 (S.C. 1983).

Opinion

*528 ORDER

Respondents move to dismiss this appeal from an order of the master-in-equity on the ground the appeal was improperly filed in this Court. Respondents assert the appeal should have been taken to the circuit court.

Appellant has not filed a return to the motion to dismiss. In filing his appeal with this Court appellant apparently relied on a stipulation in the order of reference authorizing the master to enter a “final judgment” under Section 15-31-10 of the 1976 Code of Laws of South Carolina, as amended.

Section 14-11-90 of the 1976 Code, as amended, however, specifically requires that appeals from final judgments be filed in the circuit court unless otherwise directed by order of the circuit court or by consent of the parties. The final judgment language of the order of reference merely brings the master’s report within the exception to the general requirement that the circuit court execute a final order based on a master’s report. S. C. Code § 14-11-90 (1976, as amended).

Since there has been no order of the circuit court authorizing an appeal from the master-in-equity to this Court and the parties have not so consented, the appeal should have been taken to the circuit court.

This appeal is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc.
338 S.E.2d 323 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
Windham v. Sanders
337 S.E.2d 205 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)
Fox v. Munnerlyn
287 S.C. 577 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1985)
Luck v. Pencar, Ltd.
320 S.E.2d 711 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Baptist Foundation for Christian Education v. Baptist College
317 S.E.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)
Precision Power Co. v. Adams
325 S.E.2d 59 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 S.E.2d 693, 278 S.C. 527, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glass-v-glass-sc-1983.