Glass v. Glass

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Glass v. Glass

199 So. 3d 303, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10349, 2016 WL 3611019

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 6, 2016

DocketNo. 3D15-13

StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 3d 303 (Glass v. Glass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glass v. Glass, 199 So. 3d 303, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10349, 2016 WL 3611019 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

SUAREZ, C.J.

Richard Randal Glass, former Husband, appeals from a Final Judgment of Dissolution. We affirm in all respects, but remand solely for the trial court to correct the calculation of the amount of unpaid wages to Natalie Ann Glass, former Wife. The trial court correctly determined that the Husband owed the Wife $52,982.43 in wages earned but not received in 2011, in addition to the $219,226.86 he owes her for unpaid wages from 2006-2010. The Amended Final Judgment, however, added those two amounts and declared the total, $324,025.50, as what the Husband owed the Wife for 2006-2010, and then incorrectly added another $52,982.43 for 2011. The Wife concedes that this is incorrect.

We affirm the Final Judgment of Dissolution in all respects, but remand to correct the Final Judgment by subtracting $52,982.43 from the total the Husband owes to the Wife.

Affirmed; remanded for correction of calculation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUAREZ, C.J.

Richard Randal Glass, former Husband, appeals from a Final Judgment of Dissolution. We affirm in all respects, but remand solely for the trial court to correct the calculation of the amount of unpaid wages to Natalie Ann Glass, former Wife. The trial court correctly determined that the Husband owed the Wife $52,982.43 in wages earned but not received in 2011, in addition to the $219,226.86 he owes her for unpaid wages from 2006-2010. The Amended Final Judgment, however, added those two amounts and declared the total, $324,025.50, as what the Husband owed the Wife for 2006-2010, and then incorrectly added another $52,982.43 for 2011. The Wife concedes that this is incorrect.

We affirm the Final Judgment of Dissolution in all respects, but remand to correct the Final Judgment by subtracting $52,982.43 from the total the Husband owes to the Wife.

Affirmed; remanded for correction of calculation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 So. 3d 303, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10349, 2016 WL 3611019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glass-v-glass-fladistctapp-2016.