Glass v. Cracovaner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glass v. Cracovaner

283 A.D. 779, 128 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6518

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1954

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 283 A.D. 779 (Glass v. Cracovaner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glass v. Cracovaner, 283 A.D. 779, 128 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6518 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Special circumstances have been shown justifying the examination of Dr. Paltauf as a witness. Although an employee of defendant hospital, he was not acting for the hospital in any way connected [780]*780with the death which is the subject of complaint in this action and it would not be in order to examine him under rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice. If plaintiff wishes to examine the doctor, the examination should be sought of him as a witness upon specified necessary and material items. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to further proceedings in accordance with the above. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Breitel, Bastow and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Special circumstances have been shown justifying the examination of Dr. Paltauf as a witness. Although an employee of defendant hospital, he was not acting for the hospital in any way connected [780]*780with the death which is the subject of complaint in this action and it would not be in order to examine him under rule 121-a of the Rules of Civil Practice. If plaintiff wishes to examine the doctor, the examination should be sought of him as a witness upon specified necessary and material items. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to further proceedings in accordance with the above. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Breitel, Bastow and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 779, 128 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glass-v-cracovaner-nyappdiv-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack