Glass v. Allen
This text of 80 S.E. 284 (Glass v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where a demurrer to the petition and a plea were filed after the expiration of the time allowed by law, but the case was never marked “in default,” it was error, on the call of the case for trial, to strike the demurrer and plea because not filed in time. Davis v. South Carolina R. Co., 107 Ga. 420 (33 S. E. 437); Gordon v. Hudson, 120 Ga. 698 (48 S. E. 131); Chambless v. Livingston, 123 Ga. 257 (51 S. E. 314); Gillis v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 127 Ga. 678 (56 S. E. 1003); Hodnett v. Stewart, 131 Ga. 67 (2), 68 (61 S. E. 1124). See also Clifton v. Fiveash, 122 Ga. 383 (50 S. E. 134).
2. In Gordon v. Hudson, supra, the court declined to follow, in its entirety, the ruling in Deering Harvester Co. v. Thompson, 116 Ga. 418 (42 S. E. 772), saying: “Anything in [that case] that is contrary to what is now held is not binding .as authority, for the reason that the case . . was decided by only five Justices, while the present case is based on an earlier decision [Davis v. South Carolina R. Co., supra], rendered by a full bench of six Justices.”
3, After striking the demurrer and plea the court erred in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 S.E. 284, 141 Ga. 30, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glass-v-allen-ga-1913.