Glasgow v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glasgow v. Evans

291 A.D.2d 372, 736 N.Y.S.2d 884, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1292

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 291 A.D.2d 372 (Glasgow v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glasgow v. Evans, 291 A.D.2d 372, 736 N.Y.S.2d 884, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated October 10, 2000, as denied that branch of her motion which was to extend her time to serve a summons and complaint upon the defendant Brooklyn Hospital Center pursuant to CPLR 306-b and granted the cross motion of the defendant Brooklyn Hospital Center pursuant to CPLR 306-b to dismiss the action insofar as asserted against it, and (2) an order of the same court dated June 28, 2001, as denied that branch of her motion which was for leave to renew.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motions and granted the respondent’s cross motion. Florio, J. P., Smith, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated October 10, 2000, as denied that branch of her motion which was to extend her time to serve a summons and complaint upon the defendant Brooklyn Hospital Center pursuant to CPLR 306-b and granted the cross motion of the defendant Brooklyn Hospital Center pursuant to CPLR 306-b to dismiss the action insofar as asserted against it, and (2) an order of the same court dated June 28, 2001, as denied that branch of her motion which was for leave to renew.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff’s motions and granted the respondent’s cross motion. Florio, J. P., Smith, McGinity and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 372, 736 N.Y.S.2d 884, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glasgow-v-evans-nyappdiv-2002.