GLASGOW ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Brooks

Missouri Court of Appeals

GLASGOW ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Brooks

294 S.W.3d 141, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1487, 2009 WL 3260348

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 13, 2009·No. ED 91845·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendants, Oscar and Augustine Brooks, appeal the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. The judgment, inter alia, ordered the defendants to reimburse the plaintiff, Glasgow Enterprises, Inc., for taxes and insurance premiums it paid. The court then granted the defendants a credit of $8,400 against the amount awarded for rent they paid the plaintiff. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendants, Oscar and Augustine Brooks, appeal the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. The judgment, inter alia, ordered the defendants to reimburse the plaintiff, Glasgow Enterprises, Inc., for taxes and insurance premiums it paid. The court then granted the defendants a credit of $8,400 against the amount awarded for rent they paid the plaintiff. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(1).

GLASGOW ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Brooks, 294 S.W.3d 141, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1487, 2009 WL 3260348 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

294 S.W.3d 141 (GLASGOW ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related