Glaser v. Reno
This text of 6 Serg. & Rawle 206 (Glaser v. Reno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The paper which was offered in evidence by the plaintiff, and admitted by the Court, was not a receipt by the clerk of MiClurg, but in the nature of a certificate, that a certain quantity of iron had been delivered, long after the transaction happened. The case of Cluggage v. Swan, is decisive against the evidence. The defendant had a right to the oath of M'-Laughlin, and the benefit of a cross-examination. There are other objections to the evidence, concerning which we give no opinion. The judgment must be reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.
Judgment reversed, and a venire facias de novo awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Serg. & Rawle 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glaser-v-reno-pa-1820.