Glaser v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.
This text of 448 F. App'x 324 (Glaser v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lawrence F. Glaser appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 and motion for sanctions, which were filed in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glaser v. Enzo Biochem, Inc., No. 1:02-cv-01242-GBL (E.D.Va. Apr. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 F. App'x 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glaser-v-enzo-biochem-inc-ca4-2011.