Glascow v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

39 A.D.3d 344, 832 N.Y.S.2d 433

This text of 39 A.D.3d 344 (Glascow v. Costco Wholesale Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glascow v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 39 A.D.3d 344, 832 N.Y.S.2d 433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), entered on or about May 9, 2006, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s moving papers failed to establish as a matter of law that the water depicted in the photograph, showing track marks, had not been on the floor of its premises for a sufficient length of time for its employees to have discovered and remedied it (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837 [1986]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History
492 N.E.2d 774 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A.D.3d 344, 832 N.Y.S.2d 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glascow-v-costco-wholesale-corp-nyappdiv-2007.