Glascoe v. Martoff

453 F. App'x 374
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 2011
DocketNo. 11-1629
StatusPublished

This text of 453 F. App'x 374 (Glascoe v. Martoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glascoe v. Martoff, 453 F. App'x 374 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Deirdre C. Glascoe appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Appellees, denying Glascoe’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, and ruling on other pending motions. She also appeals the court’s denial of her post-judgment motion for new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. Glascoe v. Martoff, No. 1:09-cv-00708-GBL-TCB (E.D.Va., Apr. 20, May 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 F. App'x 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glascoe-v-martoff-ca4-2011.