Home/Supreme Court/Glascock v. McDaniel

Glascock v. McDaniel

252 U.S. 575, 40 S. Ct. 395
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 19, 1920
DocketNo. 287
StatusPublished

This text of 252 U.S. 575 (Glascock v. McDaniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glascock v. McDaniel, 252 U.S. 575, 40 S. Ct. 395 (1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of [576]*576September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726. Mr.

William B. Moore and Mr. George 8. Ramsey for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Grant Foreman, Mr. James D. Simms and Mr. Charles F. Runyan for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 U.S. 575, 40 S. Ct. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glascock-v-mcdaniel-scotus-1920.