Glascock v. Bridges

15 La. Ann. 672
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Land, J.

This is an action to recover damages for a malicious prosecution. The plaintiff was in possession and command as master, of the steamboat Bayou Belle, by virtue of a contract made with one of the part-owners who was himself, at the time, in command of the boat. The defendant for the purpose of obtaining possession of the boat, caused the plaintiff to be arrested, on the pretext that he had violated the Act of 1858 relative to the protection of crews and owners of steamboats. It is very evident that the only object of the defendant, was to to obtain possession of the boat, and that he acted without probable cause in the matter of the arrest. Under such circumstances, the advice of counsel, as contended, will not exempt the defendant from liability for damages to the plaintiff, who has been aggrieved by his act.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Glascock v. Bridges, 15 La. Ann. 672 (La. 1860).

15 La. Ann. 672 (Glascock v. Bridges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Moser
1937 OK 585 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1937)
Imo Oil & Gas Co. v. Knox
1931 OK 440 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Cooper v. Flemming
114 Tenn. 40 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1904)
S. Jacobs, Bernheim & Co. v. Crum
62 Tex. 401 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)
Hamilton v. Smith
39 Mich. 222 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1878)