Glascock v. Bridges
This text of 15 La. Ann. 672 (Glascock v. Bridges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action to recover damages for a malicious prosecution. The plaintiff was in possession and command as master, of the steamboat Bayou Belle, by virtue of a contract made with one of the part-owners who was himself, at the time, in command of the boat. The defendant for the purpose of obtaining possession of the boat, caused the plaintiff to be arrested, on the pretext that he had violated the Act of 1858 relative to the protection of crews and owners of steamboats. It is very evident that the only object of the defendant, was to to obtain possession of the boat, and that he acted without probable cause in the matter of the arrest. Under such circumstances, the advice of counsel, as contended, will not exempt the defendant from liability for damages to the plaintiff, who has been aggrieved by his act.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 La. Ann. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glascock-v-bridges-la-1860.