Glantz v. Jacaranda Heights Condominium Ass'n
This text of 617 So. 2d 327 (Glantz v. Jacaranda Heights Condominium Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
While we find no error in the trial court’s order of dismissal, we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in assessing attorney’s fees against him on the authority of section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1991). Even though the appellant may not have been entitled to damages, it is apparent that he was entitled to some relief under Count I, which relief the appellees voluntarily provided after this action was initiated, thereby rendering any further proceedings on that count unnecessary. Further, even assuming that some of appellant’s post-dismissal conduct was questionable, taken as a whole, we do not believe appellant’s action can be classified as frivolous under section 57.105. See Greenberg v. Manor Pines Realty Corp., 414 So.2d 260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
Accordingly, we remand with directions that the award of attorney’s fees be stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
617 So. 2d 327, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2876, 1993 WL 74273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glantz-v-jacaranda-heights-condominium-assn-fladistctapp-1993.