Glantz v. Charles-Lee Building Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Glantz v. Charles-Lee Building Corp.

246 A.D. 515

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 515 (Glantz v. Charles-Lee Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glantz v. Charles-Lee Building Corp., 246 A.D. 515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff in falling as she emerged from an automatic self-service elevator in an apartment house where she resided. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that it cannot be said as a matter of law that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff in falling as she emerged from an automatic self-service elevator in an apartment house where she resided. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that it cannot be said as a matter of law that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glantz-v-charles-lee-building-corp-nyappdiv-1935.