Glantz v. Bregstein
This text of 170 A.D. 910 (Glantz v. Bregstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the plaintiff did not plead absence of light in the hallway as a ground of negligence, and specified in particular other grounds, he was not entitled to have that question submitted to the jury on the question of the liability of the defendants. We think, however, that the judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial granted because of error in the charge at folio 419, and on the further ground that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the grounds above stated. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.D. 910, 154 N.Y.S. 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glantz-v-bregstein-nyappdiv-1915.