Glahn, R., Aplt. v. DEP
This text of Glahn, R., Aplt. v. DEP (Glahn, R., Aplt. v. DEP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
ROGER GLAHN AND DONNA : No. 26 MAP 2022 GORENCEL, : : Appellants : : v. : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL : PROTECTION, : : Appellee :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2022, the appeal is QUASHED. To the extent
jurisdiction is premised upon Rule of Appellate Procedure 311(a)(4), see Pa.R.A.P.
311(a)(4) (allowing an immediate appeal as of right from an order denying a injunction),
Appellants sought injunctive relief against entities that are not parties to this action.
Furthermore, Appellants failed to appeal the Commonwealth Court’s February 15, 2022
memorandum and order, which also denied relief along the same lines as the order that
is the subject of this appeal.
The “Application for Sanctions” and the “Emergency Application for Special Relief
in the Nature of Mandamus” are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Glahn, R., Aplt. v. DEP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glahn-r-aplt-v-dep-pa-2022.