Glafcke v. O'Brien

Wyoming Supreme Court

Glafcke v. O'Brien

1 Wyo. 316

DecidedMarch 15, 1875

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wyo. 316 (Glafcke v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Glafcke v. O'Brien, 1 Wyo. 316 (Wyo. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Fisher, C. J.:

And now, to wit, March 28, 1876, the court, after consideration of the rule and answer, find that in order to obtain a stay of execution, or to act as a supersedeas, as provided in the statutes of 1873, the plaintiff in error should commence his proceedings in error, by filing his petition and a transcript of the case in the supreme court, together with an undertaking, as provided by the statutes. And that the mere filing of an undertaking, without commencing any other proceedings in error, is not, in itself, sufficient to give a stay of proceedings or act as a supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Fisher, C. J.:

And now, to wit, March 28, 1876, the court, after consideration of the rule and answer, find that in order to obtain a stay of execution, or to act as a supersedeas, as provided in the statutes of 1873, the plaintiff in error should commence his proceedings in error, by filing his petition and a transcript of the case in the supreme court, together with an undertaking, as provided by the statutes. And that the mere filing of an undertaking, without commencing any other proceedings in error, is not, in itself, sufficient to give a stay of proceedings or act as a supersedeas.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wyo. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glafcke-v-obrien-wyo-1875.