Glaenzer v. Wiederer

33 F. 583, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2886
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedNovember 1, 1887
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 33 F. 583 (Glaenzer v. Wiederer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Glaenzer v. Wiederer, 33 F. 583, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2886 (circtsdny 1887).

Opinion

Lacombe, J.

Complainant, on his application for preliminary injunction, refers to the decision of Judge Wheeler in hall v. Stern, 15 Fed. Rep. 463, sustaining this patent. Additional evidence, however, which was, not before the court in that case, is here presented. If, in view of that new proof, complainant’s patent is to be sustained at all, it mast be sustained by so narrow a margin as hardly to warrant a decision in his favor in advance of the trial. In view of this condition of affairs, and. of the other questions raised on the motion, the application for injunction is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradley v. Eccles
120 F. 947 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York, 1903)
Earl v. Southern Pac. Co.
75 F. 609 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 F. 583, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/glaenzer-v-wiederer-circtsdny-1887.