Gladys Bissonette v. Alexander Haig, Theodore J. Loeffler, Appellee/cross v. Paul N. Carlin, Etc., Appellant/cross Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Etc. v. C.R.S.T., Inc. (Sic), Reed Wayne Hamilton v. Crispus Nix, Etc.

Eighth Circuit

Gladys Bissonette v. Alexander Haig, Theodore J. Loeffler, Appellee/cross v. Paul N. Carlin, Etc., Appellant/cross Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Etc. v. C.R.S.T., Inc. (Sic), Reed Wayne Hamilton v. Crispus Nix, Etc.

788 F.2d 494, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25013, 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,154

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 8, 1986

Docket85-1301

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 788 F.2d 494 (Gladys Bissonette v. Alexander Haig, Theodore J. Loeffler, Appellee/cross v. Paul N. Carlin, Etc., Appellant/cross Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Etc. v. C.R.S.T., Inc. (Sic), Reed Wayne Hamilton v. Crispus Nix, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gladys Bissonette v. Alexander Haig, Theodore J. Loeffler, Appellee/cross v. Paul N. Carlin, Etc., Appellant/cross Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Etc. v. C.R.S.T., Inc. (Sic), Reed Wayne Hamilton v. Crispus Nix, Etc., 788 F.2d 494, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 25013, 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,154 (8th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

788 F.2d 494

40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,154

Gladys BISSONETTE, et al., Appellants,
v.
Alexander HAIG, et al., Appellees.
Theodore J. LOEFFLER, Appellee/Cross Appellant,
v.
Paul N. CARLIN, etc., Appellant/Cross Appellee.
CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS AND HELPERS, etc., Appellant,
v.
C.R.S.T., INC. (sic), Appellee.
Reed Wayne HAMILTON, Appellant,
v.
Crispus NIX, etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 84-2617-SD, 84-2553-EM, 84-2574-EM, 85-1301-NI and 84-2089-SI.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

April 8, 1986.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.

Prior Reports: 776 F2d 1384, 780 F2d 379, 780 F2d 1365, 781 F2d 619.

ORDER

The Court has before it the following petitions:

1.) Petition for rehearing en banc filed by appellee/cross-appellant Loeffler in appeals 84-2553 and 84-2574.

2.) Petition for rehearing en banc filed by appellee in appeal 85-1301.

3.) Petition for rehearing en banc filed by appellees in appeal 84-2089.

4.) Petition for rehearing en banc filed by appellees in appeal 84-2617.

The petitions in Nos. 84-25 53/84-2574, 84-2089 and 84-2617 are granted. The petition for rehearing en banc in 85-1301 was previously granted on March 21, 1986. The Clerk is directed to schedule these appeals for argument on Thursday, May 15, 1986, at St. Paul, Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI