Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections

Superior Court of Maine·Decided September 5, 2018·No. KENap-18-11·Unpublished

Opinion

..

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT KENNEBEC, SS. CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-18-11

NICHOLAS GLADU, Petitioner DECISION AND ORDER V.

MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent

Nicholas Gladu, an inmate at the Maine State Prison, has appealed the decision of the Commissioner of the Maine Department of Corrections denying his grievance as to the manner in which his court filing fees have been deducted from his prisoner account. This petition for judicial review has been brought pursuant to 5 M.R.S. §§ 11001-11008 (Maine Administrative Procedure Act) and M.R.Civ.P. 80C. Gladu has incurred several court filing fees (including for this matter) for which he is liable in accordance with 4 M.R.S. § 1058. When Gladu learned that the business office at the Maine State Prison was deducting 20% of all his filing fees simultaneously (i.e., as they were incurred) rather than sequentially, he pursued a grievance through all levels of the process until the Commissioner finally denied it on February 14, 2018. Citing caselaw that is no longer good authority, Gladu complains that deducting his filing fees simultaneously has the effect of taking all of the money in his account leaving him with nothing to spend. He contends that this practice deprives him of his right of access to the courts. Gladu's argument is without merit and has been definitively rejected by the United States Supreme Court. See Bruce v. Samuels, _ _U.S.__, 136 S.Ct. 627 (2016). .

CONCLUSION The entry is: The Petition for Judicial Review is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to incorporate this Order by reference in the docket of this case in accordance with M.R.Civ.P. 79(a).

DATED: November 5, 2018

Justice, Maine Superior Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, (Me. Super. Ct. 2018).

Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections (Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruce v. Samuels
577 U.S. 82 (Supreme Court, 2016)