Gladstone v. Gladstone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gladstone v. Gladstone

23 A.D.2d 649, 257 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4640

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 649 (Gladstone v. Gladstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gladstone v. Gladstone, 23 A.D.2d 649, 257 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4640 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on December 9, 1964, granting plaintiff wife’s motion for temporary alimony and counsel fee in an action for separation, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements to either party, but with leave to plaintiff wife to apply to the trial court for the relief sought on the motion. The parties were married in 1959 and physically separated in 1963. There was no issue of the marriage. Both parties had been previously married and the wife has a son who is being supported by the prior husband. The husband supported the wife at a rate of approximately $1,011 per month after the physical separation but before he allegedly discovered post-separation misconduct by the wife. The wife has substantial assets and at one time during the marriage, at least, was interested in a business. Because of the heavily disputed issues, the fact that the wife has available assets, and because an early trial is indicated, as noted by Special Term, there is no necessity for the temporary relief granted (Lake v. Lake, 194 N. Y. 179, 184; Layton v. Layton, 19 A D 2d 726). On the other hand, the trial court will be in untrammeled position to make appropriate provision in all respects. Concur — -Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on December 9, 1964, granting plaintiff wife’s motion for temporary alimony and counsel fee in an action for separation, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements to either party, but with leave to plaintiff wife to apply to the trial court for the relief sought on the motion. The parties were married in 1959 and physically separated in 1963. There was no issue of the marriage. Both parties had been previously married and the wife has a son who is being supported by the prior husband. The husband supported the wife at a rate of approximately $1,011 per month after the physical separation but before he allegedly discovered post-separation misconduct by the wife. The wife has substantial assets and at one time during the marriage, at least, was interested in a business. Because of the heavily disputed issues, the fact that the wife has available assets, and because an early trial is indicated, as noted by Special Term, there is no necessity for the temporary relief granted (Lake v. Lake, 194 N. Y. 179, 184; Layton v. Layton, 19 A D 2d 726). On the other hand, the trial court will be in untrammeled position to make appropriate provision in all respects. Concur — -Breitel, J. P., Valente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 649, 257 N.Y.S.2d 408, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gladstone-v-gladstone-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack