Gladstone v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York
228 N.E.2d 821, 19 N.Y.2d 1004
This text of 228 N.E.2d 821 (Gladstone v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gladstone v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York, 228 N.E.2d 821, 19 N.Y.2d 1004 (N.Y. 1967).
Opinion
Irving A. Gladstone et al., Appellants,
v.
Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Morris Weissberg for appellants.
J. Lee Rankin, Corporation Counsel (Eric J. Byrne and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gladstone v. Board of Education
228 N.E.2d 821 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
228 N.E.2d 821, 19 N.Y.2d 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gladstone-v-bd-of-educ-of-the-city-of-new-york-ny-1967.