Gladney v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gladney v. State

355 S.W.3d 569, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1719, 2011 WL 6835248

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 27, 2011

DocketED 96487

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 355 S.W.3d 569 (Gladney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gladney v. State, 355 S.W.3d 569, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1719, 2011 WL 6835248 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Gladney (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court erred because the record establishes that his plea counsel failed to answer Movant’s question regarding how Movant might be convicted of receiving stolen property when the property in question was not reported stolen.

*570 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court did not abuse its discretion. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI