Gladney v. Cass Commercial Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gladney v. Cass Commercial Bank

302 S.W.3d 811, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 113, 2010 WL 444878

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 9, 2010·No. No. ED 92834·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Gladney appeals from the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Cass Commercial Bank and 1st Financial Federal Credit Union. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We grant Cass Commercial Bank’s Motion to Strike Appellant’s Appendix and Related Portions of Appellant’s Brief. We grant Mr. Gladney’s Motion for Leave to File Amended Reply to Respondents’ Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Strike Appendix. We deny 1st Financial Federal Credit Union’s Motion for Sanctions. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mark Gladney appeals from the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Cass Commercial Bank and 1st Financial Federal Credit Union. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We grant Cass Commercial Bank’s Motion to Strike Appellant’s Appendix and Related Portions of Appellant’s Brief. We grant Mr. Gladney’s Motion for Leave to File Amended Reply to Respondents’ Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Strike Appendix. We deny 1st Financial Federal Credit Union’s Motion for Sanctions. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Gladney v. Cass Commercial Bank, 302 S.W.3d 811, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 113, 2010 WL 444878 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

302 S.W.3d 811 (Gladney v. Cass Commercial Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.